This website uses cookies for anonymised analytics and for account authentication. See our privacy and cookies policies for more information.





The voice of Scotland’s vibrant voluntary sector

Published by Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations

TFN is published by the Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations, Mansfield Traquair Centre, 15 Mansfield Place, Edinburgh, EH3 6BB. The Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations (SCVO) is a Scottish Charitable Incorporated Organisation. Registration number SC003558.

Parliament pensions fund guns, tobacco and fossil fuels

This news post is almost 7 years old
 

Campaigners have called for the scheme for MSPs and their staff to opt for ethical investments

The Scottish Parliament’s pension scheme is investing in weapons, tobacco and fossil fuels.

Campaigners have called for investments that contribute to climate change, poor health and war to be replaced with those that will benefit the planet.

The Scottish Parliamentary Pension Scheme has been found to have invested in fossil fuels, tobacco firms and the arms industry. Companies that benefitted included British American Tobacco and Rolls Royce.

The multi-million pound fund is run by private investment managers and overseen by trustees, who are mainly MSPs.

John Finnie MSP, justice spokesperson for the Scottish Greens, said he has been calling for the fund to be changed for years.

"The pension fund for MSPs and their staff is complicit in the misery caused by warfare, climate change and the legacy of the tobacco industry,” he said. “Anyone with an ounce of ethics would want this fund to get out of those investments, and it's now clear that is also the view of most Scots.

"The managers of Holyrood's fund cannot wring their hands any longer. In light of major divestment announcements recently from the likes of Edinburgh University, Lloyd's of London and even New York City, there's simply no excuse."

Friends of the Earth Scotland's director Dr Richard Dixon said: “These funds cannot provide for a safe future whilst backing the business-as-usual models of oil and gas companies intent to drill every last drop, despite the climate consequences.

"The record high temperatures in the Arctic and the enormous impact of extreme weather events in these islands highlights the climate emergency we are currently facing.”

A poll of 1,000 Scots by Survation showed that 72% of respondents thought the MSP pension fund should not be able to invest in companies involved in arms manufacture, fossil fuel extraction and tobacco.

Duncan Thorp of Social Enterprise Scotland said that there is a wide range of ethical investments that are available to the fund.

“All public sector pension funds should find ways to divest from industries that harm people and planet,” he said.

“There are many opportunities for these huge pension funds to proactively invest in ethical alternatives.”

 

Comments

0 0
lok yue
almost 7 years ago
John Finnie says "Anyone with an ounce of ethics would want this fund to get out of those investments, and it's now clear that is also the view of most Scots". Perhaps 'most Scots' would have preferred to freeze last week when without conventionally generated power there would have been widespread power cuts. without fossil fuels, mr. Finnie might have found it difficult to fly to Gaza (2012), Berlin (2015) and San sebastian (2016). Would 'most Scots' prefer our armed forces to have no guns or would 'most Scots', being sensible and hard headed folk, think that those such as Mr. Finnie go through life with with their feet planted firmly several feet above the ground
0 0
lok yue
almost 7 years ago
Anyone with an ounce of ethics would want this fund to get out of those investments, and it's now clear that is also the view of most Scots". Perhaps 'most Scots' would have preferred to freeze last week when without conventionally generated power there would have been widespread power cuts. without fossil fuels, mr. Finnie might have found it difficult to fly to Gaza (2012), Berlin (2015) and San sebastian (2016). Would 'most Scots' prefer our armed forces to have no guns or would 'most Scots', being sensible
Commenting is now closed on this post