This website uses cookies for anonymised analytics and for account authentication. See our privacy and cookies policies for more information.





The voice of Scotland’s vibrant voluntary sector

Published by Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations

TFN is published by the Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations, Mansfield Traquair Centre, 15 Mansfield Place, Edinburgh, EH3 6BB. The Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations (SCVO) is a Scottish Charitable Incorporated Organisation. Registration number SC003558.

After Orlando: let’s beat the ideology of hate

This opinion piece is over 8 years old
 

Tim Hopkins of the Equality Network on the aftermath of the Orlando killings

We have all in Scotland been affected by the news from Orlando.

For LGBTI people the shock, sadness, anxiety and anger have been particularly personal. Shock that the kind of place – a gay bar – that many of us consider a safe and special haven should be turned into a place of mass murder.

Sadness and much more for those whose lives have been ended or devastated, and, more personally, that yet again our community is a target for hate.

Anxiety because, as LGBTI people, we grew up constantly fearing the reaction of others to our true identity, and that fear continues.

Tim Hopkins

It is the ideology of hate, of disrespect for the common humanity of those who are different, that needs addressed

Tim Hopkins

Thousands of people in Scotland are now married to a same-sex partner, but visibly same-sex couples holding hands are a rare sight. The fear of attack, verbal or worse, continues to affect every day of our lives.

Anger can sometimes end up wrongly targeted. I think, though, that some responses to Orlando deserve our anger.

Donald Trump, a man who wants to reverse the US Supreme Court ruling on marriage equality, and opposes trans equality and LGBTI non-discrimination law, is using this attack, and a claimed concern for lesbian and gay people, in justification of grossly racist and Islamophobic rhetoric and policy. That makes me very angry.

Meanwhile, here, openly gay writer Owen Jones cut short a Sky TV interview in anger on Sunday night, refusing to accept being told repeatedly by presenter Mark Longhurst that it was wrong to highlight that this was an anti-LGBT attack.

Owen was right of course – this was an attack on a gay venue, chosen because it was a gay venue. Whatever complexities are still to be uncovered about the killer’s motives, it’s clear that this was a deliberate homophobic hate crime.

Of course, inappropriate responses have been far outweighed by the support, care and concern shown by so many. Vigils in Glasgow, Dumfries, Aberdeen, Dundee, Thurso, Edinburgh and Stirling, organised spontaneously by diverse groups of LGBTI people, are being attended by hundreds. And civic institutions across the country have shown their concern and support with rainbow flags and other visible gestures.

We also need to look to more substantive responses. The BBC’s Call Kaye programme on Tuesday asked “Should religion to do more to combat homophobia?” My answer is that we all need to do more to combat homophobia, biphobia and transphobia.

The Orlando killer said he acted in the name of “Islamic State”. The man who, in 1999, murdered and maimed people with a nail bomb in the London gay bar Admiral Duncan, did so in the name of neo-Nazism.

It is the ideology of hate, of disrespect for the common humanity of those who are different, that needs addressed.

We should all, people of religious faith or otherwise, speak up to say that the fact that others live their lives differently than we do in no way diminishes those others’ worth, humanity, and right to full equality, and in no way justifies discrimination, prejudice or abuse of any kind.

Tim Hopkins is director of the Equality Network.

 

Comments

0 0
Joe Ray
over 8 years ago
I think the response to the Orlando attack which should merit the most anger is the response of people who seek to deny the responsibility of the true cause of this attack and instead deflect blame onto the likes of Donald Trump and others who did not causes this massacre.Let’s remind ourselves that this attack was carried out by a Muslim who claimed divine sanction for his act by telephoning the emergency services and declaring his allegiance to Islamic State, who peddle the most homophobic ideology on the planet and one that is rooted in Islamic foundational texts.For instance, it is very easy to read the Hadith and see the verse demanding that gays be launched from high buildings to their death this is exactly what Islamic State do to gay men in Iraq and Syria. This verse is used explicitly to justify their actions and is often read out to the watching attendees as it happens.You could have used your column to challenge the violent and extremist religious ideology of the ever-growing international Jihadist movement, of which ISIS is merely the most prominent actor. Instead you decided to play politics and challenge Donald Trump’s ‘homophobia’, when he or his followers had nothing to do with the attack. This is just denial of the worst kind.Until you can get over the notion that challenging violent and intolerant interpretations of Islam is somehow ‘irrational’ and ‘phobic’ then you are part of the problem.You seem very well versed and eager in challenging right-wing and I assume Christian homophobia. Perhaps you can demonstrate some consistency and begin challenging Islamic homophobia.
0 0
Tim Hopkins
over 8 years ago
Hi Joe, At no point did I defend "Islamic State", which is an organisation that is clearly filled from top to bottom with the ideology of hate. I don't need you to tell me that "Islamic State" kill gay men in the territory they control by throwing them off high buildings; I've seen some of their propaganda photographs - and that makes me a lot more angry and upset than I am with Donald Trump's recent behaviour. It is the ideology of hate, which one can also see in other extremist political or religious movements, which in my view we should all be challenging, not just in "Islamic State", but wherever it is found. As for Donald Trump, at no point of course did I blame him for the attack. His rhetoric is in my view racist and Islamophobic because he targets it at Muslims, not at the purveyors of hate and terror. I would rather not be in a position of mentioning any politician negatively in relation to the appalling attack in Orlando, but Trump jumped on the issue within hours (when relatives did not even know the fate of their loved ones), to make political capital personally against his political opponents. It's his cynical use of the tragedy, his divisive rhetoric, combined with his opposition to LGBTI equality, that make me angry with him.
Commenting is now closed on this post