Dr Judith Turbyne urges the Scottish Government to prioritise stable funding models and better use of resources for charities
Children in Scotland, the national children’s sector network, has responded to a new pre-budget report by the Scottish Parliament’s Social Justice and Social Security Committee, which highlighted the growing financial concerns currently faced by many third sector organisations. Pre-Budget Scrutiny 2025-26: Third sector funding principles has called on the Scottish Government to prioritise longer-term funding models to create more stability and better use of resources across the sector.
As a membership organisation representing a wide range of third sector voices, Children in Scotland was really pleased to be involved the Social Justice and Social Security Committee’s inquiry, which made space for positive and importance discussions about our future.
Between the cost of living crisis and inflation, the third sector is facing a multitude of challenges, and many organisations are struggling to meet demand as children, young people and families face their own financial struggles.
This report sends a clear and concise message – third sector funding needs to be urgently reviewed to ensure that we can continue to support those most in need across our society.
The Scottish Government needs to tackle this issue head on, and the third sector needs to see proactive action in the forthcoming budget. Without an urgent rethink of funding, focusing on longer-term models of three to five years, many vital third sector organisations will simply not survive the current economic climate.
Bringing together evidence and expertise from charities, social enterprises and voluntary organisations, including Children in Scotland, the committee’s pre-budget report, published on 13 November, said that prioritising three-year-funding and including provisions for inflation-based adjustments in the next budget would be vital for addressing the significant challenges impacting Scotland’s third sector.
As outlined in the report, the third sector has seen a decrease in Scottish Government funding, with £21.1 million allocated in the 2024-25 year budget compared to £21.2m in 2023-24 – marking a 0.5% cash decrease and 2.1% real terms reduction during a time of high demand for services.
Recognising the critical role the third sector plays in supporting Scottish society, the report said fair and efficient funding could contribute to its continued effectiveness, as witnesses to the committee raised concerns about inconsistency, complexity, and a lack of transparency in the application process for funding.
What’s more, the committee’s report recognised that short-term funding cycles also divert significant amounts of time and resources away from the delivery of services, which was raised as particularly concerning for organisations working to address long-term, complex social issues, such as poverty, youth engagement and social care.
Short-term funding, it outlined, not only prevents organisations from engaging in meaningful, long-term strategic planning but impacts on service delivery, which is key to the implementation of Scottish Government policy.
Dr Judith Turbyne is chief executive of Children in Scotland.
Representing 450 charities, statutory bodies, organisations, and individual professionals across Scotland, Dr Turbyne gave evidence to the Committee and backed widespread calls for a multi-year funding approach to address issues ranging from staff turnover to financial instability.
Whilst I can totally understand the points made about stable funding there is no way the Scottish Government could seriously and responsibly commit to such a commitment unless the UK Government agreed to never decrease the amount of Scottish money they allow Scotland to get back- that will never happen! Without that the only option for stable funding would be to set a very small percentage of current funding as 'stable' - possibly as low as 20%; hopefully then the Scottish Government would always be able to maintain that level of funding as a minimum no matter what the UK Government decided to do. Any other approach would mean other vital services would face increased funding cuts. Maybe some of those in the 3rd sector have to look closer to home and ask themselves why 'empire building' still seems to be rife with HQ spending so often being prioritised over core servicesat ground level!