This website uses cookies for anonymised analytics and for account authentication. See our privacy and cookies policies for more information.





The voice of Scotland’s vibrant voluntary sector

Published by Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations

TFN is published by the Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations, Caledonian Exchange, 19A Canning Street, Edinburgh EH3 8EG. The Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations (SCVO) is a Scottish Charitable Incorporated Organisation. Registration number SC003558.

Exclusive: charity regulator throws out complaint over boycott of Israeli goods

 

Unite members at the cinema announced an agreement with the board earlier this month

Scotland's charity regulator has dismissed a complaint about a charity-run cinema in Glasgow over a decision to boycott goods and brands linked to Israel. 

Earlier this month Unite Hospitality members working at the Glasgow Film Theatre (GFT) reached an agreement with management to remove goods for sale at the cinema listed under Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaign.

Coca-Cola products will no longer be sold, and a wider review of the GFT’s relationship with other goods and organisations will be reviewed. 

A spokesperson for the GFT said at the time: “The GFT has also confirmed that the wider question of the adoption of the BDS movement is still under review by the board, in line with their legal and charitable obligations.   

“At this stage our Board of Trustees had started but not completed a review of the Unite staff requests. The goal of the review is to ensure that any decisions made do not infringe our legal and charitable obligations and that all staff can have their voice heard.”

Unite Hospitality hope the GFT remove Barclays advertising at the venue and endorse the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (PACBI), implementing a wider BDS support campaign at the venue.

Unite members added: “As Unite members at the GFT, we celebrate this decision and will continue to encourage the cinema in this positive direction. 

“We believe that the removal of Coca-Cola sends a clear message to those companies that continue to profit from genocide and we hope this act will encourage similar venues to take a stand in solidarity with the people of Gaza.”

UK Lawyers for Israel (UKLFI) wrote a letter to OSCR, the independent regulator for charities in Scotland, alleging breaches of sections seven and eight of the Charities and Trustee Investment (Scotland) Act 2005 (the Act), claiming support for boycotts like BDS are outside GFT’s charitable purposes and therefore illegal.

UKLFI claimed the GFT was also in breach of section 66 of the Act in relation to the breaches of duties by the GFT’s Trustees, the Equality Act 2010 and its Memorandum and Articles of Association.

Caroline Turner, director of UKLFI, said: “The political activism undertaken by the GFT by boycotting Coca-Cola products is clearly not in line with the GFT’s legal and charitable obligations, and brings the reputation of the GFT into disrepute, both as a business and a charity.  

“We urge the Board of Trustees to reconsider their position and stop the boycott.“

However, OSCR confirmed the complaint will not be taken forward.

An OSCR spokesperson said: "We have assessed the concerns raised and concluded that they do not present a regulatory issue. The matter is for the charity to decide, and therefore, OSCR will not be taking any further action."

 

Comments

13 6
Robert
about 1 month ago

Unsurprisingly, the truth is the exact opposite of UKLFI's claims. It would be the *continued* sale of Coca Cola products, and the implicit endorsement of genocide, that would bring GFT into disrepute.

Furthermore, from the OSCR's website, GFT's charitable purposes are "the advancement of, arts, heritage, culture, or science". Therefore, it is surely obliged (morally if not legally) to oppose to the cultural erasure to which Israel is subjecting Palestine.

4 4
Graham Hall
about 1 month ago

Shocking decision by the cinema, boycott!

4 4
George Walker
about 1 month ago

The post by Mr Steve Jones is impartial in as much as there is no reference made to the actions of Netanyhu being cited as a war crimes by the ICC, nor the various independent reports of the many inhumane and criminal actions of the IDF towards civilians, particularly children, (often recorded and celebrated by those who committed these war crimes) the deliberate destruction of all civilian infrastucture, homes, hospitals, schools, universities, actions, deliberately timed to happen when these were in use, denial of civilian access to fresh water, electricity, closing of access to first aid, medical and food supplies. Mr Jones also makes no reference to the Israeli use of their "Hannibal Protocols" when inferring to the "thousands" of deaths caused by Hamas. Nor does he make reference the illegal occupation of Palestinian land beyond the borders agreed to by Ben Gurion in 1948, nor the Israeli state sponsored building of settlements on this occupued land and the destruction of agricultural land owned and used successfully by the Palestinian farmers for centuries, land that so suddenly became "desert that bloomed" only when stolen and given Eastern European and American illegal immigrants.

3 3
Ismail ashedi
about 1 month ago

There should not be a boycott, it is not right and doesn't send a good message. Cannot start asking people to boycott countries and their good and associated companies. Where does it stop if you do this, it's the wrong way to go about things. I am aware of the bad things Hamas did to start this, and cannot call the honest people who get caught up in it all.

1 1
Uma Iqbal
about 1 month ago

I do not think that George Walker knows what it would have been like for the people in Israel to be taken from their own homes and held captive and then murdered. He should think before he speaks. People were just going to a music festival or were at home. From his comments they appear very uninformed and naïve of the overall situation. Sad state of affairs when a country cannot defend itself from such atrocities happening again. It is one thing to read the news and another to know people affected by what has happened. Ultimately there should be no war, but prior actions by hamas have caused this. The cinema should should show no bias.

4 5
Steve Jones
about 1 month ago

Unbelievable that the cinema is taking this stance. I am aware of people who have decided not to visit the cinema due to this boycott. It is racist and xenophobic taking sides when a terrorist regime have killed thousands of people. Coca Cola are not going to be too concerned, but puts the cinema and staff in a bad light.